It’s late at night and you are
driving home from work. After a long shift there is nothing more that you want
to do then put your feet up and relax. However before you can reach your
driveway your rearview mirror lights up with blue flashing lights. You are
being pulled over. The officer approaches your vehicle and in a cliché manner
asks, “Do you know why I pulled you over?” This is one of the many tricks an
officer has in their disposal to uncover any illegal activity you may or may
not be a part of. In a calm, polite manner, always answer in the negative and
state you do not know as to the reason for the traffic stop. After a brief moment, the officer states that
you have a faulty taillight and asks to see your license and registration.
After returning from the cruiser, the officer proceeds to ask if he can search
your vehicle. It is at this moment that many people forfeit their
constitutionally given rights against unwarranted search and seizure as many
mistake the officers request as a command. Again in a calm polite manner, one
should always refuse an officer’s request to search your vehicle, even if you
have nothing to hide. During a search, property may be damaged or evidence
planted. In order to search your vehicle without a warrant and your consent an
officer must posses Probable Cause. This entails that the officer have a level of reasonable belief based on facts
or evidence that can be articulated that would lead a reasonably intelligent
and prudent person to believe the person has committed a crime. Common examples
of probable cause include
the sight or smell of contraband in plain view such as a baggie containing
drugs or plain smell or an admission to a crime. There are four categories into which evidence
may fall in establishing probable cause: observational, circumstantial,
expertise, and information. The first, observational, is as previously
described when an officer through their senses observe anything that
constitutes a potential crime.
Circumstantial and expertise evidence is based on the officer and known
facts such as gang tattoos or other markings that culminated together gives a
reasonable impression a crime has or will be committed. Finally an officer may
have probable cause if he were made aware to information through an informant or
witness of a crime committed. Overall, there are many tools an officer has to
their disposal in order to either legally search your vehicle or trick you into
giving consent. It is your right to refuse such violation of your privacy but
never attempt to physically stop an officer from conducting a search, legal or
not. Instead contact Boyle & Carbone, PC. We will fight to have any
evidence suppressed, but it all starts with “no, I do not consent.”
Keep updating Sir. I love your blog.David Dribbin and Michael Brown are traffic lawyers with a combined 40 years experience representing clients charged with driving offences, such as, careless driving, dangerous driving, driving whilst disqualified, driving whilst suspended, drink driving, DUI drive under the influence, drug driving, excessive speed, loss of traction all the way to the most serious driving offences such as culpable driving, dangerous driving causing death, negligently causing serious injury, conduct endangering life and conduct endangering serious injury. Instilled in all the lawyers that work at Dribbin & Brown is the notion that we must do the very best for our clients.
ReplyDeleteDrink Driving Lawyers Melbourne